Authored by

Sheila Ng

Insolvency and Arbitration: Clash of Cultures?

Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Authored Publication: Rajah & Tann Singapore has contributed to an article in a special edition of the South Square Digest. Issued by South Square Chambers, this edition features articles collaborative articles between members of South Square and members of INSOL International.

The article, “Insolvency and Arbitration: Clash of Cultures?“, compares the relationship between arbitration and insolvency in England and Singapore. It addresses the issue of transactions entered into at an undervalue by a debtor, whether such disputes may fall within the scope of an arbitration clause, and whether it is arbitrable in the first place.

Sheila Ng, Deputy Head of our Restructuring & Insolvency Practice, in collaboration with Felicity Toube, QC, and Matthew Abraham of South Square, authored the above article.

The full edition of the South Square Digest can be read here.

Related Articles

Arb-Med-Arb: An Effort to Enhance Amicable Dispute Resolution

To offer another chance at preserving relationships, Arb-Med-Arb has emerged as a means of incorporating mediation into the arbitral process, where parties who have commenced arbitration may “pause” proceedings to attempt to settle the dispute by mediation.

Recent Court Decisions: Are Myanmar Courts Pro-Arbitration?

Since the enactment of the Myanmar Arbitration Law 2016 (“MAL”), there have only been a handful of arbitration-related cases. We briefly summarise three key judgments issued by the Myanmar Courts concerning provisions of the MAL.