BANI has published its 2025 Rules and Procedures, introducing significant changes that could impact how businesses handle dispute resolution and raising important considerations for parties involved in arbitration under it.
In DMZ v DNA [2025] SGHC 31, the Singapore High Court considered the relationship between arbitral institutions and the parties to the arbitrations they administer, as well as the supervisory court’s role in overseeing institutional arbitrations.
In the upcoming 2025 edition of the Paris Arbitration Week, Rajah & Tann Asia will be hosting the event “Navigating Cross-Cultural Dynamics in International Arbitration” with a distinguished panel of our leading arbitration practitioners.
Insolvency and arbitration traditionally do not mix well, as they embody somewhat contrasting legal policies. In the modern era, however, insolvency and arbitration have increasingly overlapped.
On 9 December 2024, the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) published the 7th edition of the Arbitration Rules of the SIAC.
In the recent Constitutional Court Decision No. 100/PUU-XXII/2024, the Constitutional Court clarified what qualifies as a “foreign arbitral award” under Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution.
As a prominent alternative dispute resolution mechanism, arbitration plays a pivotal role in resolving commercial disputes. One key aspect of arbitration proceedings is evidence-taking …
Arbitration agreements will typically state that any dispute “arising out of or in connection with” the underlying contract is to be resolved by arbitration. However, what are the limits on the expansive scope intended by this phrase?
A key feature of arbitration is that it offers parties the opportunity to have their dispute resolved in private. Even when arbitral proceedings spill over into court, there are implements to safeguard the parties’ privacy.